§ 10 · Emission · Overview
Emission
A smooth curve to 2.1 billion PRL, with no halvings
On this page 5 sections
Every PRL that exists was created by a block. The first transaction of each block, the coinbase, may create a fixed amount of new coins out of nothing and pay them to the miner. That amount is the subsidySubsidy: The brand-new PRL created in each block. Block 1 created about 3,229.64 PRL, and the amount shrinks a little with every block after that., and the schedule it follows is Pearl’s emissionEmission: The schedule for creating new PRL. By block h, at most 2.1 billion × h ÷ (h + 650,226) PRL exist, so half arrives in about four years and the rest ever more slowly..
Bitcoin’s schedule is a staircase: 50 coins a block, then 25, then 12.5, a step down every four years or so. Pearl’s is a ramp. The subsidy shrinks a little with every single block, along one smooth curve that heads toward 2.1 billion PRL and never quite gets there.
The whole curve fits in one fraction.
Try it
Drag across the heights. Watch the reward per block slide down and the total issued climb, and compare with a halving schedule.
What is the formula?
After block h, the most PRL that can have been created is:
The fraction h ÷ (h + C) starts at 0, is exactly ½ at h = C, and creeps toward 1 forever. The genesis block even spells it out: “Cumulative emission h/(h+650226)”.
Each block’s subsidy is simply how much the curve rises at that block:
Pearl’s code computes this with big integers for every block, so the numbers are exact:
| Height | Subsidy | Issued through this block | Share of 2.1 B |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3,229.64134063 PRL | 3,229.64134063 PRL | 0.0002% |
| 1,000 | 3,219.74020196 PRL | 3,224,686.98 PRL | 0.15% |
| 100,000 | 2,426.05131516 PRL | 279,915,652.08 PRL | 13.33% |
| 130,827 (20 Oct 2026) | 2,238.32513878 PRL | 351,751,673.70 PRL | 16.75% |
| 650,226 (about 4 years) | 807.41219776 PRL | 1,049,999,999.997 PRL | 50% |
| 1,000,000 | 501.41467282 PRL | 1,272,552,971.53 PRL | 60.60% |
The live total is 351.8 million PRL.
Why the subsidies add up to the curve exactly (telescoping)
Write the curve as f(h) = S·h ÷ (h + C). The rise from block h − 1 to block h is
The numerator collapses because h(h − 1 + C) − (h − 1)(h + C) = C. That’s the subsidy formula. Now add the subsidies of blocks 1 to h: every middle term cancels with its neighbor, like a telescope folding up, and only f(h) − f(0) = f(h) is left.
The real sum is a hair smaller, because each subsidy is rounded down to a whole grain. Through block 130,827 the exact sum is 351,751,673.70138799 PRL against 351,751,673.70204070 on the curve: 65,271 grains of rounding dust, less than one grain per block.
Why 650,226?
It’s four years of blocks. Pearl’s code computes it from the target block time, with 365-day years:
So at exactly 194 seconds per block, the curve has a lovely shape in years. After t years,
One year in: 20%. Four years: 50%. Twelve years: 75%. Thirty-six years: 90%. Every further step takes longer.
How does it compare with halvings?
Both schedules issue half their coins in about four years. After that they part ways.
| Years (nominal) | Pearl issued | Bitcoin issued |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | 66.7% | 75% |
| 12 | 75% | 87.5% |
| 20 | 83.3% | 96.9% |
| 36 | 90% | 99.8% |
Pearl front-loads less and keeps paying miners for much longer. Bitcoin’s subsidy is halved again and again until it rounds to zero; Pearl’s keeps shrinking but, within any height the software can count, never reaches zero (see supply and grains).
How fast does the reward shrink?
Slowly, and a little less each year. For large h, the subsidy behaves like S·C ÷ (h + C)²: it falls with the square of the distance from block −C.
- Per block, on 20 October 2026: from 2,238.32513878 PRL at block 130,827 to 573,155 grains less at the next block, about 0.00026%.
- Per day (445 blocks at the target pace): about 0.11%.
- Half of block 1’s subsidy is first reached at block 269,334, about 1.66 years in. A quarter, at block 650,228, about four years in.
There is no cliff anywhere. Miners never wake up to half the income they had yesterday.
Make a guess
Blocks run faster than 194 seconds for a year. Does the emission curve change?
Think of your answer first, then check it.
Answer No. The curve is fixed in blocks; it just arrives earlier on the calendar.
The formula takes only the height h. If blocks average less than 194 seconds, heights are reached sooner and coins arrive ahead of the “t ÷ (t + 4)” calendar. On 20 October 2026 the last 144 blocks had averaged 174.3 seconds, so the schedule was running a little early. Difficulty pulls the pace back toward 194 seconds over time; see WTEMA.
Code: CalcBlockSubsidy
From validate.go (node/blockchain/validate.go:160-190 at v1.5.2, on GitHub). The constant is recomputed from the
chain’s TargetTimePerBlock, so it is 650,226 on every network that uses 194-second blocks:
if height == 0 {
return 0
}
targetTimePerBlockSeconds := int64(chainParams.TargetTimePerBlock / time.Second)
emissionConstant = (4 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60) / targetTimePerBlockSeconds
h := int64(height)
numerator := new(big.Int).Mul(big.NewInt(totalSupply), big.NewInt(emissionConstant))
denominator := new(big.Int).Mul(big.NewInt(h+emissionConstant), big.NewInt(h-1+emissionConstant))
subsidy := new(big.Int).Div(numerator, denominator)
return subsidy.Int64() In JavaScript, with BigInt:
const S = 210_000_000_000_000_000n, C = 650_226n;
const subsidy = (h) => (h === 0n ? 0n : (S * C) / ((h + C) * (h - 1n + C)));
subsidy(1n); // 322964134063n grains = 3,229.64134063 PRL